U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2007

Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians v. Weyerhaeuser Co.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 11, 2007 · Nelson, Rawlinson, Schwarzer
484 F.3d 1086 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Stephen V. Bomse, M. Laurence Popof-sky and Heather N. Leal, Heller Ehrman White & McAuliffe LLP, San Francisco, CA, for the appellant., Michael E. Haglund, Haglund, Kelley, Horngren & Jones, LLP, and Roy Pulvers, Lindsay, Hart, Neil & Weigler, LLP, Portland, OR, for the appellee.

Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The judgment of the district court is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Ross-Simmons, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 1069, - L.Ed.2d - (2007).

In fulfilling this mandate, the district court may hold such hearings and enter such orders as it deems appropriate.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.