U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2007

Plumlee v. Cortez Masto

Plumlee v. Cortez Masto
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 10, 2007 · Schroeder
497 F.3d 981; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 19002; 2007 WL 2317645 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Jason F. Carr, Esq., Federal Public Defender’s Office, Las Vegas, NV, for Petitioner-Appellant., Joseph W. Long, Esq., Nevada Attorney General’s Office, Ely, NV, Victor Hugo Schulze, II, Esq., Office of the Nevada Attorney General, Las Vegas, NV, for Respondents-Appellees.

Plumlee v. Cortez Masto

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court,1 it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

. Judge Rawlinson is recused.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.