Feltes v. Gonzales

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit February 26, 2007

Feltes v. Gonzales, 222 F. App'x 640 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because *641the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name: Hossam Noshy FELTES v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney General
Status: Published