U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2007

Tinoco-Garcia v. Gonzales

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 9, 2007 · Bea, Graber, Scannlain

227 F. App'x 615

Counsel

Alejandro Garcia, Esq., City of Commerce, CA, for Petitioner., CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office Of The District Counsel, Department Of Homeland Security, San. Francisco, CA, OIL, U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Respondent’s opposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The Board of Immigration Appeals correctly determined petitioner’s removability. See 8 U.S.C. § 1256(a); Biggs v. INS, 55 F.3d 1398, 1401 (9th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.