U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2007

Estrada v. Gonzales

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 9, 2007 · Bea, Graber, Scannlain

227 F. App'x 623

Counsel

Juana Estrada, Anaheim, CA, pro se., CAC-Distriet Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Richard M. Evans, Esq., Paul Fiorino, Esq., DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM**

Petitioner seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision, dated August 30, 2006, denying petitioner’s fifth motion to reopen as numerically barred. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2).

The regulations provide that “a party may file only one motion to reopen.... ” See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). Therefore, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s fifth motion to reopen. See id., see also Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 895-96 (9th Cir. 2003). Petitioner has failed to identify any issue sufficiently substantial to warrant further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.