U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2007

United States v. Rosales-Rosales

United States v. Rosales-Rosales
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 18, 2007 · Bea, Clifton, Scannlain
228 F. App'x 725

United States v. Rosales-Rosales

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Efren Rosales-Rosales appeals from his jury-trial conviction and 168-month sentence imposed for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a) & 846.

*726Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Rosales-Rosales’ counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.