U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2007

Setyawan v. Gonzales

Setyawan v. Gonzales
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 30, 2007 · Bea, Clifton, Graber
230 F. App'x 716

Setyawan v. Gonzales

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Alefka Yosua Samuel Setyawan seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals affirming without opinion an immigration judge’s order denying Setyawan’s application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the discretionary determination that an applicant has failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative, see Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir. 2003), and Setyawan does not raise a colorable due process claim, see Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005) (“[Traditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would invoke our jurisdiction.”).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.