Aleman v. Gonzales
Aleman v. Gonzales
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because petitioner’s motion to reopen before the Board of Immigration Appeals violated the numerical limitations on motions to reopen. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2) (providing that a party may file only one motion to reopen proceedings after a final administrative decision was filed). Thus, the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.
All other pending motions are denied as moot.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.