U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2007

Serrato v. Gonzales

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 14, 2007 · Callahan, Gould, Kozinski

231 F. App'x 750

Counsel

Cirino Rubio Serrato, Azusa, CA, pro se., CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Jonathan F. Potter, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Offiee of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The agency did not abuse its discretion in denying petitioner’s motion as numerically-barred. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(2), (c)(3). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.