U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2007

United States v. Ellis

United States v. Ellis
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 7, 2007
234 F. App'x 503

United States v. Ellis

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Defendant Stanley Gene Ellis pleaded guilty to one count of a felon in possession of a firearm. The district court sentenced him to 188 months’ imprisonment pursuant to the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984, 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). Defendant’s only argument on appeal is that his prior convictions should have been alleged in the charging document and either admitted or proved to a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. We affirm.

Defendant’s argument is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 243-47, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). See also United States v. Grisel, 488 F.3d 844, 846 (9th Cir. 2007) (en banc) (noting that Almenda-rez-Torres remains good law). Defendant’s argument that we should invoke the doctrine of constitutional doubt is foreclosed by Grisel, 488 F.3d at 846-47.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.