U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2007

Gomez-Dominguez v. Gonzales

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 11, 2007

234 F. App'x 530

Counsel

Hugo Gomez-Dominguez, La Habra, CA, pro se., CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Kurt B. Larson, Esq., P. Michael Truman, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Hugo Gomez-Dominguez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ adoption and affirmance of an immigration judge’s denial of his application for cancellation of removal. Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.

We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary hardship determination as well as petitioner’s non-colorable claim that the agency deprived him of due process by failing to consider adequately the hardship his son would face if he is deported. Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.