U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2007

Pineda-Carlos v. Gonzales

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 12, 2007

234 F. App'x 535

Counsel

Reynaldo Pineda-Carlos, Santa Ana, CA, pro se., Elsa Pineda-Martinez, Santa Ana, CA, pro se., Adad Hoazir Pineda, Santa Ana, CA, pro se., Adi Guadalupe Pineda, Santa Ana, CA, pro se., Tiare Itzayana Pineda, Santa Ana, CA, pro se., CAC-District, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. LeFevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, James A. Hunolt, Esq., Song Park, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioners’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect this status.

Respondent’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

All other pending motions are denied as moot. The temporary stay of removal shall continue in effect until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.