U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2007

United States v. Portillo

United States v. Portillo
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 14, 2007
234 F. App'x 635

United States v. Portillo

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Jesus Tomas Ortiz Portillo appeals from the 57-month sentence imposed following remand under United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Portillo’s challenges to the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b) and the continuing validity of Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), are foreclosed. See United States v. Beng-Salazar, 452 F.3d 1088, 1097 (9th Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.