U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2007

United States v. Velasquez-Lagunas

United States v. Velasquez-Lagunas
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 27, 2007 · Hawkins, Schroeder, Wardlaw
235 F. App'x 501

United States v. Velasquez-Lagunas

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Appellant Palemón Velasquez-Lagunas appeals his sentence after pleading guilty to violating of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, being a deported alien found in the United States. Appellant contends that his increased sen*502tence, imposed pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1), is unconstitutional.

We have reviewed the record and the opening brief and conclude that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). The United States Supreme Court’s decision in Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 247, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), remains binding on this court until the Court overrules it. See United States v. Weiland, 420 F.3d 1062, 1079 n. 16 (9th Cir. 2005) (noting that this court remains bound by the Supreme Court’s holding in Almendarez-Torres that a district court judge may enhance a sentence on the basis of prior convictions, even if the fact of those convictions was not found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt).

Accordingly, the government’s motion for summary affirmance of the district court’s judgment is granted.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.