MEMORANDUM **

Efren Arana-Olivas appeals from the district court’s revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Arana-Olivas’ challenge to the constitutionality of the supervised release sentencing scheme is foreclosed by this court’s decision in United States v. Huerta-Pi-*630mental, 445 F.3d 1220, 1224-25 (9th Cir. 2006) (explaining why supervised release sentencing scheme does not violate Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000)).

AFFIRMED.