Arizimendi v. Gonzales
Arizimendi v. Gonzales
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Maria Guadalupe Gomora Arizimendi, and her husband Jose Jesus Roman Atarazan, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals denying their application for cancellation of removal.
We lack jurisdiction to review the BIA’s discretionary determination that petitioners failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to a qualifying relative. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 892 (9th Cir. 2003). Petitioners’ equal protection and due process challenge to the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act (“NACARA”) is foreclosed. See Jimenez-Angeles v. Ashcroft, 291 F.3d 594, 602-03 (9th Cir. 2002); Hernandez-Mezquita v. Ashcroft, 293 F.3d 1161, 1165 (9th Cir. 2002).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED IN PART, AND DENIED IN PART.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
. Petitioner Jesus Roman Almazan is a minor child of the lead petitioners, and petitioners concede that he has no qualifying relative and is therefore ineligible for cancellation relief.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.