U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2007

United States v. Fonseca-Urias

United States v. Fonseca-Urias
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided October 1, 2007
249 F. App'x 650

United States v. Fonseca-Urias

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Ramon Arturo Fonseca-Urias appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 27-month sentence for being an alien in the United States after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326.

*651Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Fonseca-Urias’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no meritorious issues for review, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our examination of the brief and our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no arguable issues for review on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.