Gill v. Keisler
Gill v. Keisler
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
We conclude that substantial evidence supports the Immigration Judge’s adverse credibility determination and the consequent denial of asylum and withholding of removal. See Razor v. Gonzales, 418 F.3d 1061, 1067-68 (9th Cir. 2005). Because Gill’s CAT claim rests on the same testimony rejected by the IJ as not credible, his CAT claim also fails. See Faraii v. Ashcroft, 348 F.3d 1153, 1157 (9th Cir. 2003).
PETITION DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.