United States v. Fernandez-Gastelum
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Reynaldo Fernandez-Gastelum appeals from his 37-month sentence imposed for
Fernandez-Gastelum contends that his sentence is unreasonable because it does not adequately reflect the mitigating features of his case. We disagree. The district court carefully considered Fernandez-Gastelum’s history and circumstances, addressed the statutory factors specified in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), properly applied the Sentencing Guidelines, and granted Fernandez-Gastelum a two-level downward departure before imposing a sentence at the bottom of the Guidelines range. We cannot conclude such a sentence is unreasonable. See United States v. Plouffe, 445 F.3d 1126, 1131 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 547 U.S. 1158, 126 S.Ct. 2314, 164 L.Ed.2d 832 (2006).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- United States v. Reynaldo FERNANDEZ-GASTELUM
- Status
- Published