Mozo-Genel v. Mukasey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Mozo-Genel v. Mukasey, 256 F. App'x 151 (9th Cir. 2007)

Mozo-Genel v. Mukasey

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Jaime Mozo-Genel, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals decision affirming the immigration judge’s denial of petitioner’s application for cancellation of removal.

We lack jurisdiction to consider petitioner’s challenge to the IJ’s extreme hardship determination because it is a nonreviewable discretionary determination. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir. 2003) (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)). Petitioner’s contention that the agency violated his due process rights by failing to properly evaluate the evidence of hardship does not amount to a colorable constitutional claim. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name
Jaime MOZO-GENEL v. Michael B. MUKASEY, Attorney General
Status
Published