U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2008

Perretta v. Prometheus Developement Company, Inc

Perretta v. Prometheus Developement Company, Inc
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided May 23, 2008

Perretta v. Prometheus Developement Company, Inc

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT LOUIS A. PERRETTA, JR.; FRANK  PERRETTA, No. 06-15526 Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. v. CV-05-02987-WHA PROMETHEUS DEVELOPMENT  Northern District of COMPANY, INC.; SANFORD N. California, DILLER; JOHN J. MURPHY; VICKI R. San Francisco MULLINS, ORDER Defendants-Appellees.  Filed May 23, 2008 Before: David R. Thompson and Milan D. Smith, Jr., Circuit Judges, and William Q. Hayes,* District Judge.

ORDER The Defendants-Appellees’ motion to file a reply is GRANTED.

The Defendants-Appellees’ Petition for Panel Rehearing is GRANTED. The opinion dated March 27, 2008, is with- drawn.

The court requests supplemental briefing by the parties regarding the applicability of the ratification provision of Cal. Corp. Code § 16103(b)(3) to the issue of whether the vote in this case was sufficient to ratify the transaction. The simulta- *The Honorable William Q. Hayes, United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

6091 6092 PERRETTA v. PROMETHEUS DEVELOPMENT neous briefs may not exceed twenty (20) pages, and shall be due no later than June 13, 2008.

PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.