U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2008

Barnes-Wallace v. Boy Scouts of America

Barnes-Wallace v. Boy Scouts of America
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 12, 2008

Barnes-Wallace v. Boy Scouts of America

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MITCHELL BARNES-WALLACE;  MAXWELL BREEN, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. No. 04-55732 CITY OF SAN DIEGO, Defendant,  D.C. No. CV-00-01726- and NAJ/AJB BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - DESERT PACIFIC COUNCIL, Defendant-Appellant.  MITCHELL BARNES-WALLACE;  MAXWELL BREEN; LORI BARNES- WALLACE, Guardian Ad Litem; LYNN BARNES-WALLACE, Guardian Ad Litem; MICHAEL BREEN, No. 04-56167 Guardian Ad Litem; VALERIE D.C. No. BREEN, Guardian Ad Litem, Plaintiffs-Appellants,  CV-00-01726- NAJ/AJB v. ORDER CITY OF SAN DIEGO; BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - DESERT PACIFIC COUNCIL, Defendants-Appellees.  Filed June 11, 2008 Before: William C. Canby, Jr., Andrew J. Kleinfeld, and Marsha S. Berzon, Circuit Judges.

6625 6626 BARNES-WALLACE v. BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ORDER The petition of Defendants-Appellees for panel rehearing is GRANTED. The certification order filed in this case on December 18, 2006, is withdrawn. A new certification order with accompanying concurrence and dissent is filed contem- poraneously with the filing of this order. Subsequent petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed.

The pending petition of defendants-appellees for rehearing en banc is dismissed as moot. No other petitions for panel or en banc hearing have been filed.

PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON REUTERS/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2008 Thomson Reuters/West.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.