U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2008

Simpson v. Homestore.Com, Inc.

Simpson v. Homestore.Com, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 26, 2008 · Beezer, Gould, Nelson
519 F.3d 1041; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 6198 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Peter E. Borkon, Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy, Burlingame, CA., Robert Hutchinson, Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy, Beverly Hills, CA, Clifford H. Pearson, Wasserman, Comeden, Casselman & Pearson LLP, Tarzana, CA, for Plaintiff., Joseph W. Cotchett, Cotchett Pitre & McCarthy, Burlingame, CA, Nancy L. Fineman, Cotchett & Pitre San Francisco Airport Office Center, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant., Robert C. Vanderet, O’Melveny & Myers, LLP, Howard M. Privette, Paul Hastings Janofsky & Walker, LLP, Dean J. Kitchens, Gibson Dunn & Cruthcher, LLP, John B. Quinn, Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges, LLP, Jeffrey H. Dasteel, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Michael C. Tu, Daniel J. Tyukody, Jr., Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe, LLP, Melissa M. Dulac, Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, David C. Scheper, Overland Borenstein Scheper & Kim, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, Robert C. Friese, Shartsis Friese, LLP, Nanci L. Clarence, Clarence Snell & Dyer LLP, San Francisco, CA, Peter T. Barbur, Cravath Swaine & Moore, LLP, Stephen P. Warren, Samuel Kadet, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, New York, NY, F. Whitten Peters, Washington, DC, Jeffrey Speiser, Edward S. Nathan, Stern & Kilcullen, Roseland, NJ, Walter J. Robinson, III, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Palo Alto, CA, William A. Isaacson, Boies, Schiller & Flexner, Roger C. Spaeder, Carl S. Kravitz, Zuckerman, Spaeder, Goldstein, Taylor & Kolker, Everett Johnson, Belinda Lee, Latham & Watkins, LLP, Washington, DC, Roy R. Newman, Atkinson, Andelson, Loya, Ruud & Romo, Cerritos, CA, Paul D. Murphy, Murphy Rosen & Cohen, LLP, Santa Monica, CA, J. Christian Word, Latham & Watkins, Reston, YA, for Defendants-Appellees., Eric A. Isaacson, Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins, LLP, San Diego, CA, David H. Braff, Sullivan & Cromwell, New York, NY, for Amicus Curiae.

Simpson v. Homestore.Com, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Pursuant to the judgment of the United States Supreme Court issued on February 25, 2008 in Avis Budget Group v. California State Teachers Retirement System, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 1119, 169 L.Ed.2d 945 (2008), we vacate our opinion at 452 F.3d 1040 (9th Cir. 2006), vacate the district court’s decision, and remand for fur*1042ther proceedings which are consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.