Sallie Mae Servicing Corp. v. Ransom
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision.
- America's Servicing Co. v. Schwartz-Tallard (In re Schwartz-Tallard) (9th Cir. 2014)
- America's Servicing Co. v. Schwartz-Tallard (In re Schwartz-Tallard) (9th Cir. 2014)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Under Espinosa v. United Student Aid Funds, Inc., 553 F.3d 1193 (9th Cir. 2008), which came down after the bankruptcy appellate panel had ruled, the provisions of the confirmed plan have preclusive effect. Espinosa controls. It expressly overruled the bankruptcy appellate panel decision in this case. Id. at 1204 n. 6. Accordingly, the judgment of the bankruptcy appellate panel is vacated. We are a second, independent reviewer of the bankruptcy court. Miller v. Cardinale (In re DeVille), 361 F.3d 539, 547 (9th Cir. 2004). Following Espinosa, we affirm the bankruptcy court’s decision.
JUDGMENT BELOW VACATED; BANKRUPTCY COURT AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.