United States v. Newcomb
United States v. Newcomb
302 F. App'x 585
United States v. Newcomb
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
The officers had reasonable suspicion, based on their collective knowledge, for the investigatory stop of Newcomb. See United States v. Diaz-Juarez, 299 F.3d 1138, 1141 (9th Cir. 2002); United States v. Sutton, 794 F.2d 1415, 1426 (9th Cir. 1986). The stop was reasonable in duration and scope because the officer had a plain view of contraband in Newcomb’s vehicle shortly after the stop began. See United States v. Garcia-Rivera, 353 F.3d 788, 791 (9th Cir. 2003).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.