Skurdal v. Deboo

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit December 10, 2008

Skurdal v. Deboo, 303 F. App'x 418 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect this status.

A review of the record and appellant’s response to the court’s order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name: Rodney Owen SKURDAL v. Kuma J. DEBOO
Status: Published