U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2008

Whitaker v. Alameda County Superior Court

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided December 10, 2008

303 F. App'x 419

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

A review of the record and appellant’s response to the court’s order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

*420Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment and the order denying appellant’s motion for reconsideration.

Appellant’s request for oral argument is denied.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.