United States v. Canez

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Canez, 305 F. App'x 430 (9th Cir. 2008)

United States v. Canez

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Benjamin Canez appeals from the 25-month sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Canez contends that it was unreasonable for the district court to impose an above-Guidelines range sentence pursuant to the departure provision set forth in U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4 Application Note 3, and that the sentence is also unreasonable in light of the applicable 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors. We conclude that the sentence is reasonable. See United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006); United States v. Mohamed, 459 F.3d 979, 986-87 (9th Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff—Appellee v. Benjamin CANEZ, Defendant—Appellant
Status
Published