Madriaga v. Kane
Madriaga v. Kane
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
For the reasons given by the district court, the evidence wasn’t sufficient to support petitioner’s conviction. In holding otherwise, the California Court of Appeal unreasonably applied Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). See Juan H. v. Allen, 408 F.3d 1262, 1274-75 (9th Cir. 2005).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Isagani Pilotin MADRIAGA, Petitioner—Appellee v. Anthony KANE, Warden, Respondent—Appellant
- Status
- Published