Soroka v. Garcia
Soroka v. Garcia
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Vladimir Soroka filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 sixteen months after AEDPA’s one-year statute of limitations expired. The district court rejected Soroka’s claim that he was entitled to equitable tolling and denied his petition as untimely. We affirm.
We review legal determinations regarding equitable tolling de novo. See Shannon v. Newland, 410 F.3d 1083, 1087 n. 3 (9th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 546 U.S. 1171, 126 S.Ct. 1333, 164 L.Ed.2d 49 (2006). Findings of fact made by the district court are reviewed for clear error. See Buckley v. Terhune, 441 F.3d 688, 694 (9th Cir. 2006).
The one-year statute of limitations for filing a habeas petition may be equitably tolled if “ ‘extraordinary circumstances’ beyond a prisoner’s control make it impossible to file a petition on time.” Calderon v. U.S. Dist. Court for the Cent. Dist. of Cal. (Beeler), 128 F.3d 1283, 1288 (9th Cir. 1997). A litigant seeking equitable tolling must show “(1) that he has been pursuing his rights diligently, and (2) that some extraordinary circumstance stood in his way.” Pace v. DiGuglielmo, 544 U.S. 408, 418, 125 S.Ct. 1807, 161 L.Ed.2d 669 (2005). “The threshold necessaiy to trigger equitable tolling ... is very high.” Miranda v. Castro, 292 F.3d 1063, 1066 (9th Cir. 2002) (quotation omitted).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Vladimir SOROKA v. Silvia GARCIA, Warden
- Status
- Published