United States v. Sandoval-Sepulveda

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
United States v. Sandoval-Sepulveda, 265 F. App'x 623 (9th Cir. 2008)

United States v. Sandoval-Sepulveda

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Victorino Sandoval-Sepulveda appeals from the 6-month sentence imposed following revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for reasonableness, United States v. Miqbel, 444 F.3d 1173, 1176 & n. 5 (9th Cir. 2006), and we affirm.

Sandoval-Sepulveda contends that the district court’s application of U.S.S.G § 7B1.3(f) resulted in an unreasonable sentence. We disagree, and conclude that the district court neither abused its discretion in considering the Chapter 7 policy statement, nor imposed an unreasonable sentence.

See Miqbel, 444 F.3d at 1176 & n. 5.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Reference

Full Case Name
United States v. Victorino SANDOVAL-SEPULVEDA
Status
Published