MEMORANDUM *

Miguel Perez-Torres petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ discretionary determination that he failed to satisfy the “exceptional and extremely *515unusual hardship” requirement for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b). We have explicitly held that this court lacks jurisdiction to review a discretionary hardship determination under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i). Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 888 (9th Cir. 2003).

Petitioner fails to raise any credible argument that would require us to resolve the question we left open in Romero-Torres. See Id. at 891 n. 5.

We DISMISS the petition for lack of jurisdiction.