Hightower v. Commissioner
Hightower v. Commissioner
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
The stock payment Glenn Hightower received for his share of Green Hills was
Because the stock payment was taxable income to Hightower in 2000, the interest which accrued on the principal was also taxable income in the year the interest was received.
Hightower was also obliged to report the pass-through distributive share of Green Hills’s income allocated to him in 2000. See Treas. Reg. § 1.1361-l(e); Pahl v. Comm’r, 150 F.3d 1124, 1129 (9th Cir. 1998); Anderson v. Comm’r, 164 F.2d 870, 873 (7th Cir. 1947). Even though Hightower’s role in Green Hills management may have been restricted, he still retained beneficial ownership of his shares through the October 13, 2000 sale date. Contrary to Hightower’s assertions, the arbitration award did not have the effect of divesting him of beneficial ownership of his Green Hills shares in 1998. Rather, it merely gave O’Dowd the financial benefit of the bargain retroactively once the sale took place in 2000. AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.