Raby v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance
Raby v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
The Rabys stand in the shoes of Durham Medical Center and Dr. Chambers, for purposes of their Complaint against American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company.
Although there was a genuine issue of fact regarding notice of the claim to Health Insurance Services, the issue of fact is not material. American International’s policy requires that notice be “given in writing to Michael Mitrovic, Esq.,” with his address. The policy defines the word “us” to mean American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company
The deposition testimony did not establish a genuine issue of fact as to whether American International had clothed Health Insurance Services with actual or ostensible authority as an agent for notice of claims. That Health Insurance Services had previously sent on a timely claim to American International did not establish that American International had or would treat claims not forwarded to itself as though they were, if they were sent instead to Health Insurance Services. Under Ellis v. Nelson
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
. The policy provides: “ ‘We’ or us’ or 'our' means American International Specialty Lines Insurance Company.”
. Ellis v. Nelson, 68 Nev. 410, 233 P.2d 1072 (1951).
. Id. at 1076.
. Id.
. Grand Hotel Gift Shop v. Granite State Insurance Company, 108 Nev. 811, 839 P.2d 599 (1992).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.