U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2008

United States v. Gomez-Baca

United States v. Gomez-Baca
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 10, 2008
269 F. App'x 649

United States v. Gomez-Baca

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Alfonso Gomez-Baea appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 46-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 *650S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Gomez-Baca’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provid*650ed by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.