U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2008

Nava v. Mukasey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided March 25, 2008

271 F. App'x 609

Counsel

CAC-District Counsel, Esq., Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, Lyle D. Jent-zer, Esq., U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

José Antonio Lopez Nava and Alma Fa-biola Lopez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ denial of their fourth motion to reopen. They contend that their applications for cancellation of removal should be granted. The petitioners timely petitioned for review only of the Board’s decision of July 18, 2006. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1); Membreno v. Gonzales, 425 F.3d 1227, 1229 (9th Cir. 2005) (en banc). They do not, however, address the Board’s ruling that their fourth motion to reopen was numerically barred under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2). We therefore deny the petition for review.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.