United States v. Batan
United States v. Batan
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Lawrence Puzon Batan appeals from the 120-month sentence imposed following his
Batan contends that his Sixth Amendment rights were violated because the district court imposed a sentence higher than the maximum sentence authorized by facts he admitted or were found by a jury.
This contention is foreclosed. See United States v. Dare, 425 F.3d 634, 635-36, 640-43 (9th Cir. 2005) (holding that the statutory maximum for § 924(e) is life imprisonment and that the judge may find during sentencing that a defendant discharged a firearm by a preponderance of the evidence).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.