MEMORANDUM **

Mark Anthony Simmons appeals from the 300-month sentence imposed following his jury-trial conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana, possession with intent to distribute marijuana, and aiding and abetting, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(l)(B)(vii), (b)(1)(C) and 846. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.G. § 1291, and we affirm.

Simmons contends that the district court erred in disregarding the jury’s determination regarding the amount of marijuana attributable to him. This contention fails because the judge’s quantity determination did not lead to a sentence above the statutory maximum. See United States v. Toliver, 351 F.3d 423, 432-33 (9th Cir. 2003).

Simmons also contends that the district court erred by find him an organizer or leader of the criminal scheme when the jury acquitted him of that conduct. It is well settled, however, that judges are permitted to consider acquitted conduct for sentencing purposes. See United States v. *601Mercado, 474 F.3d 654, 657-58 (9th Cir. 2007).

AFFIRMED.