U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2008

Moss v. Comfort Inn Woodland Hills

Moss v. Comfort Inn Woodland Hills
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided April 28, 2008
275 F. App'x 717

Counsel

Jennifer L. Steneberg, Esq., Law Offices of Thomas E. Frankovich, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants., James S. Link, Esq., Pasadena, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Moss v. Comfort Inn Woodland Hills

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

The district court’s finding that Moss did not have an intent to return to the Woodland Hills Comfort Inn on the date the lawsuit was filed is supported by substantial evidence in the record. The district court’s conclusion that Moss lacked standing is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.