Rodriguez-Chavarria v. Mukasey
Rodriguez-Chavarria v. Mukasey
Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Petitioners contend that the IJ erred in finding no continuous residence for the male petitioner, and therefore the entire petition should be remanded for further findings. Petitioners’ challenge to the IJ’s decision is misplaced. We review the decision of the BIA, and we lack jurisdiction to consider the only ground for its decision, namely that petitioners failed to show sufficient hardship, because it is a nonreviewable discretionary determination. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir. 2003) (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.