U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2008

"Mary T"ex rel. "Blake T" v. Education Department

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided June 25, 2008 · Goodwin, Ikuta, Rymer

283 F. App'x 566

Counsel

Carl M. Varady, Esq., Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiffs-Appellants., Aaron H. Schulaner, Holly T. Shikada, Office of the Hawaii Attorney General, Honolulu, HI, for Defendant-Appellee.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

Mary T., on behalf of herself and son Blake T., a minor, appeals the judgment of the district court. We dismiss the appeal.

As counsel agreed at argument, neither an affirmance nor reversal would have any effect. To decide this case, in the circumstances, would be to render an advisory opinion. We decline to do so.

DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided *567by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.