U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2008

United States v. Begaye

United States v. Begaye
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 3, 2008 · Clifton, Fletcher, Thomas
284 F. App'x 487

United States v. Begaye

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Nathan Gene Begaye appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 63-month sentence for possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(C). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Begaye’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

We dismiss this appeal in light of the valid appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir. 2000).

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.