U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2008

United States v. Ramirez-Solis

United States v. Ramirez-Solis
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided July 9, 2008 · Clifton, Leavy, Reinhardt
285 F. App'x 406

United States v. Ramirez-Solis

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

David Ramirez-Solis appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 51-month sentence for illegal reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), appellant’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and- the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.