U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2008

United States v. Dilliehunt

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 6, 2008

286 F. App'x 520

Counsel

George L. Bevan, Jr., Esquire, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Oakland, CA, Robert David Rees, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Steven S. Lubliner, Esquire, Law Offices of Steven S. Lubliner, Petaluma, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Jerry Dilliehunt appeals from the 38-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Dilliehunt contends that the district court erred by increasing his offense level by two levels for reckless endangerment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3C1.2. We conclude that the district court’s application of the enhancement was not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Reyes-Oseguera, 106 F.3d 1481, 1484 (9th Cir. 1997).

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.