U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2008

Rhodes v. Stanislaus County

Rhodes v. Stanislaus County
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 28, 2008
290 F. App'x 980

Rhodes v. Stanislaus County

Opinion of the Court

*981MEMORANDUM **

On July 24, 2008, this court ordered appellant to show cause as to why the district court’s judgment should not be summarily affirmed for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations of August 8, 2007, 2007 WL 2254409.

A review of appellant’s response to the court’s order to show cause and the record indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.