Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2008

Berkeley Police Department v. El Bey

Berkeley Police Department v. El Bey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided August 19, 2008
291 F. App'x 62

Counsel

Berkeley City Attorney’s Office, Berkeley, CA, for Plaintiffs-Appellees., Department of Motor Vehicles, Sacramento, CA, pro se., Emanuel Simon El Bey, Richmond, CA, pro se., Makare Akhet Atem Simo El Bey, Richmond, CA, pro se., Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Maxine M. Chesney, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 3:07-cv-06126-MMC., Before: CANBY, LEAVY and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.

Berkeley Police Department v. El Bey

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Appellants’ motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

A review of the record and appellants’ opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s order remanding this action to the state court.

All other pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.