U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2008

Ocampo v. Mukasey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 4, 2008

291 F. App'x 826

Counsel

Clemente Rosas Ocampo, Anaheim, CA, pro se., Juana Rosas Castro, Anaheim, CA, pro se., Mirta Yesenia Rosas Castro, Anaheim, CA, pro se., Edward C. Durant, Oil, DOJ-U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, CAC-District Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, Los Angeles, CA, Ronald E. Lefevre, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA, for Respondent.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Clemente Rosas Ocampo and his wife and their minor child, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying them motion to reopen removal proceedings.

Petitioners have waived any challenge to the BIA’s order denying their motion to reopen by failing to raise any arguments related to the BIA’s dispositive determination that the motion to reopen was untimely. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256,1259-60 (9th Cir. 1996).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.