U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2008

Love v. Hensley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 9, 2008

292 F. App'x 628

Counsel

Alfredrick Love, Imperial, CA, pro se., Attorney General CAS, Office of the California Attorney General, San Diego, CA, for Defendants-Appellees.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Johnson v. Saul (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 2021)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Alfredrick Love, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action pursuant to the screening provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915(e) and 1915A. We dismiss.

We lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal because the district court’s order dismissing Love’s complaint and granting leave to amend did not constitute the final *629judgment in this case. See WMX Technologies, Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc).

DISMISSED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.