U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2008

United States v. Padilla-Rocha

United States v. Padilla-Rocha
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 9, 2008
292 F. App'x 631

United States v. Padilla-Rocha

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Oscar Octavio Padilla-Rocha appeals from his guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute methamphetamine and cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846.

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), appellant’s counsel has filed a brief *632stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80-81, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.