U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 2008

Herships v. Superior Court

Herships v. Superior Court
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Decided September 15, 2008
293 F. App'x 473

Herships v. Superior Court

Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The Clerk shall amend the docket to reflect this status.

A review of the record and the response to this court’s order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).

It does not appear that the district court erred in dismissing the action in light of principles of comity and federalism. See Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 43-46, 91 S.Ct. 746, 27 L.Ed.2d 669 (1971). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.

AFFIRMED.

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.